Imagine waking up and writing a “research paper” that blames Black men for rape. Or posting a “paper” that says if Amanda Todd was obeying the law maybe she wouldn’t have been a victim of crime. You probably can’t. Congratulations. You aren’t Jessica Yaniv Simpson.
That’s exactly what Jessica Yaniv Simpson did. Claiming it was for a Gender Studies project, Yaniv posted these two papers to ResearchGate. The contents are shocking. We’ve posted about his papers in the past (here, and here) but these are a whole different level of fucked up. They should speak for themselves, but I’ve added some commentary to truly highlight how vile and fucked up Yaniv is. These two papers in themselves go a very long ways to show that Yaniv is a pervert, a pedophile, a deviant, and a racist.
A quick note. I truly try to avoid writing anything that mentions Amanda Todd. Her tragic story has left an imprint on people around the world. Yaniv has spent years trying to paint themselves as the “next Amanda Todd”, while ignoring the fact that so many of the traits – and actions – of Amanda Todd’s predator match what JY has said and done. JY is the next Aydin Coban. Not the next AT. My heart breaks for Carol Todd, and the fact that Yaniv is trying to capitalize on her suffering is the only reason I mention AT’s name here. It’s important to make sure it’s documented that Yaniv does this.
And now the first paper for today….Note that I’m not bothering with plagiarism, grammar, spelling, etc. We all know content is stolen and it’s poorly written. Let’s focus on what these papers say, and what they reveal about the author.
I’m not commenting on the feminist angle here. I’ll leave that for the comment section. I’m certainly not an expert.
Stop the fucking bus. “It’s cases like that of Amanda Todd’s as why pornography should be considered illegal in countries such as Canada. If the consumption and creation of pornography was outlawed in Canada, it would make cases such as those of Amanda Todd’s easier to prosecute in my belief”.
Read that a few times.
He goes on….“Creation of pornography, such as that of the case of Amanda Todd”. My head exploded here. Jessica, you pedophile fuck, I know you read MeowMix, so let me educate you.
Amanda Todd did not create pornography. The images and videos of AT are not pornography. Those are child sexual abuse images. AT was a victim of sexual exploitation. You should know this Jon. You’ve done the same thing. Remember Madison? Remember trying to tell her she would sleep better at night and get better grades if she helped you watch porn? And that she should have her 9 year old sister help too? Because it would only take 15 minutes? That’s sextortion, and grooming. That’s the same stuff Cobin did to AT. I have no doubt that you’ve done worse, too. None at all.
Moving on, notice that JY not only knew where Todd’s images and videos were posted originally, but he also knows how to find them ***NOW***. That’s VERY telling and , in my opinion, is a clear sign that Yaniv is well-versed and experienced in finding CSAM online.
That’s it (I’ve cut out a couple pages of citations). That’s what Yaniv calls a research paper. Barely two pages, double spaced. It doesn’t even answer the question posed in Yaniv’s title. It’s garbage, academically, but priceless as evidence that Yaniv is a pedophile.
I think it’s also worth pointing out Yaniv’s porn obsession here. Head over to MeowTube, to the photo gallery. Click “Obsessions” and then “Porn” to see a wide range of pictures showing Yaniv’s deviant obsession with porn. Yaniv often brags about having an OnlyFans or MyFreeCams account, or being “in a porn” with a “friend” who’s “OnlyFans site you should support”. He once created a mirror to Meghan Murphy’s website Feminist Current that redirected to an extreme porn site, and he often tweeted to porn stars compliments about their content.
Makes it pretty clear that Yaniv’s claim to be a feminist that wants porn banned are pretty empty.
Of course, Yaniv didn’t know when to stop after just one crazy paper. He followed that up with this piece. Our team was speechless.
The very first sentence…”As a radical feminist myself”. Flashback to November 2020, when Yaniv watched an online stream of feminists and posted to Snapchat the following snapshot:
What an inspiring “radical feminist”.
Next sentence: “I see how male violence the cause and effect of male dominance towards women is”. What? That’s about the quality of writing we get for the next 5 pages. I won’t point of every instance of stupidity because there are far bigger problems in this paper.
“When it comes to black men and black male violence, such as rape, the stereotypes are powerful. The stereotypical association of male violence and rape with black men is prevalent, as black men are seen with unusually large penises that damage women’s’ bodies. As such, who to accuse of rape and other forms of male violence is often stereotypical onto the black man.”
Imagine writing that in a research paper. I can’t even fully tell what he’s saying here because it makes no sense whatsoever to anyone with an ounce of intelligence. If saying that white rapists are invisible because black men have bigger dicks? Is he saying it’s rape if a black man’s penis is too large? Is he saying well-endowed Indo-Canadian men are automatically rapists? Is he saying anyone with an above-average penis is a rapist? Because women can’t consent to a man with a big penis so they must be victims?
“Rape is almost always associated with black men and in British Columbia, Canada, as an example, by Indo-Canadian men” Read that again. He goes on to say that white men are rarely accused of rape and “often held unaccountable”. That phrase doesn’t even make sense, for starters (you don’t hold people unaccountable) but it’s complete and utter racist bullshit.
Seriously though, I don’t know what the key takeaways are from these “papers”. They don’t tell me anything about feminists and porn, or “why do radical feminists see male violence as cause and effect of male dominance”. They do tell me that Yaniv holds some very racists, stereotyping views of men of colour, and that Yaniv is a pedophile that things 11-year-old girls “make porn”. I know I’ve skimmed over these papers rather quickly, and there’s so much more wrong with them, but these are the two things I felt most important to emphasize. Yaniv knows where to find the Amanda Todd CSAM online, even today, and Yaniv is very, very afraid of “big black penis”.
I wonder if the SFU faculty know their names are attached to these papers? And if these papers fall within the scope of studies for SFU’s Gender Studies or Crim programs. We’ll likely never know, due to privacy laws, but it makes you question the standards of SFU as a whole.
What will his next paper bring?
The problem with his “porn” article is that he did not define “feminism” in his own words, nor did he define “pornography” which he shortened to “porn”, by the way, that’s very bad diction in the actual heading. Defining Porn and Feminism would have been the first things he did, then once he’d defined those two terms in his own words then he could work on his argument followed by his closing summary, but he doesn’t write any of it in his own words, he just keeps citing others work after he has copied it, so there is no solid argument at all & there is virtually a two-sentence summary. I’m a writer, I could have produced that in 15 minutes, but it’s total shite. He also admitted and cited the porn site, looking for a video of a topless eleven-year-old girl & he was successful twice. That right there is a criminal offence, but like all paedophiles, he will claim it is legitimate research. Why would you write a paper on child porn? It’s fraught with danger but fat Jon the human Wombat writes about his sexual fetishes & fantasies & nothing else, it’s all good material for the wank bank, plus it satisfies his severe need to be an exhibitionist and gain attention. What he does not understand is that porn is already out there, hundreds of millions of people have downloaded it, you can’t ban it like you can’t ban guns. In the early 1980’s right through to about 2002, porn was banned in Australia. But all you had to get it was read the classifieds in the daily paper under “P” for porn and you could send away to Canberra for a 3000-video catalogue, it was a huge black market. I purchased heaps, violent ones about hurting trannies to get my rocks off, ha ha ha! If you send pornography underground, it will flourish but the stupid cunt is too dumb to realise that. Hundreds of SFU students write brilliant papers, but none of them post them on the net. These papers are way below average, they have poor diction, grammar, punctuation & spelling, they are of no scientific or research use to anybody. All these papers prove is that he’s a few sheep short in the top paddock & if brains were dynamite, he wouldn’t have enough to blow up a flea, and he can cancel any job applications he made to NASA & any organisation that requires you pass a criminal record check, which is about 99% of them. Ah, wait until the Amy Hamm case and the elderly assault matter comes to court, you’re well and truly fucked my boy. You’ll be able to write a paper on both incidents and post them to SFU from your jail cell, cunt.
Brilliant reply. I totally agree, he does write about his sexual fantasies and his spanking bank scenarios. We all KNOW that fat John wants nothing more than to be pinned down to a bathroom stall floor, have his tampon pulled out and be rogered by a large heh hum in any shade. YES JOHN we all know, there’s no shame in being rogered, just come out and say it loud and proud.
He writes about male dominance over women as he bashes a Rebel News reporter over the head with his pink cane then another time, after he had falsely accused Amy Hamm of raping him in the women’s court toilets, he bashed Keane Bexte in the head twice, right out the front of the court and it was on video. This is an angry big man telling women he is a woman writing about male violence. Ha ha ha, you’re so fucking delusional you fat cunt, you’re the fucking problem dick wad, you’re male, you’re violent and you make threats, against women, bash men and even elderly people, write about that eh cunt, bashing the elderly.
I’m white with a huge cock, so obviously I’m a violent rapist that keeps getting away with it and some poor balc blo90ke with a 15 inch cock is going to cop the blame, not me, that’s what his Radical Feminism paper basically says, but reading between the lines, what is this fat cunt’s obsession with rape? You can tell he so desperately wants to be a rape victim, al la Amy Hamm, just like he wanted to be the next AT. he’s totally fixated on rape. Seriously though, I want the next paper to be on ‘The benefits of topless pool parties for 12 year old girls”, or “Why trans men should hang around women’s toilets to help eleven year old girls insert a tampon on their first period”. I truly reckon it’s coming. he absolutely has to work out a way to write about periods to get his rocks off for the wank bank, writing about that and then publishing it will have him slapping his sealed up cunt mound all over his condo with absolute glee.
Each of his papers has been increasingly more grotesque than the last. The next will no doubt be exponentially more outrageous. He can’t help himself. Then he will mark for retaliation and trolling the person who finally stands up to him, even if they so much as merely suggest he has done something wrong
Yaniv, not Jessica, not Jonathan but Yaniv, you are a deplorable walking mound of dog vomit, an irredeemable 450 lb. EUNUCH who can never feel sexual satisfaction again. A greasy malignant pus filled blob like you can’t even larp as a human being, much less a WOMAN. You? A woman? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You are a deplorable worthless troon fuck not fit to use the name of AT in any way shape or form. Want to read again why you stupidly cut your own dick off? It was EVIDENCE. As stupid as you are with your cretinous IQ hovering in the 70’s you realized in absolute horror you sent pics of your tiny little 3″ deformed pecker to HUNDREDS of American MINORS while larping as a Cimorelli admin. I can imagine the panic welling up in you when you read Canada, the softest and most forgiving nation on earth was going to extradite, try, and imprison that sick bastard that drove AT to do what she did. If Canada would do that what would America do to Jonathan Yaniv, sex pervert who committed HUNDREDS of FELONIES sending minors pics of your pathetic little dick. You must have shit yourself every night turning in, waiting for the FBI/RCMP to kick in your door and haul you to America to face the music. Then, probably by sheer luck, you learned you could get the Canadian taxpayers to fund the removal of your dick, which also removed the evidence of all those felonies you committed. The tradeoff? No more sexual pleasure EVER again, life as a 450 lb. ugly incel troon EUNUCH FOREVER to remain a virgin. I must admit you are truly a criminal mastermind. Keffals managed to weasel $140,000 out of the mentally ill suckers that follow him. What have you reaped EUNUCH boy? A criminal record, several judgements against you, upcoming time in JAIL for beating up seniors. FFS, SENIORS??? Keffals is stupider than you, but far better off financially. Jon, you know the entire world hates you, thinks of you as dog vomit and can’t wait until you either self delete or your fat piggy lifestyle gives you a coronary, stroke, seizure or aneurism. At which point they’ll shovel your 500 lb. carcass into an oven and the world will be a far better place. Let me ask you this. Was your fetish to see a 12 hear old girl insert a tampon worth all the hatred towards you? Never to enjoy sex, never to have a partner, never to have a family, never to have a career, never to even have a single FUCKING FRIEND. You are the epitome of a loser. Take your frozen sperm and flush it, nobody will ever in a million years agree to perpetuate your genetic line. The Yaniv branch died when your dick came off. I gleefully celebrate this fact every day of my life, there will never be a Yaniv to carry on your insane fuckery, thank God. Think of it eunuch boy, when that withered old kike of your mother croaks you’ll have NOBODY to talk to. You will be alone, ostracized, hated and forgotten all within a short spell. I have no idea what Trevor and you will talk about if he flies over here next year. I’d love to be around to witness it. I may pick up the banner and “camp out” at your strata with my signboards. I won’t be nearly as civil as Elston was. I’ll call you and all your filth out and make sure that mainstream media features your criminal disgusting pedo ways every night on the news. The entire country will want you locked up for years simply for being such an insufferable maggot and paux on society. Love and kisses you degenerate AGP troon pedo incel EUNUCH.
You had me completely up until you used the word Kike. That’s not cool. Please don’t use slurs agains our Jewish brothers and sisters; it’s really awful and adds nothing of value to the conversation. And yes, I know this is not my site but I tend to say what I think almost all the time. The rest of it is glorious though.
Haha yaniv used to post porn on pages of young performers like Cimorelli from a spam account and then offer his services to clean it up. Good times
There is no way Jonny Boy speaks in class, he must sit in the back quietly.
As someone who (laughably and embarrassingly) goes to the same school as Jonny (or rather, he goes to the same school as me), I can’t even imagine what his profs/TAs must think while reading his shit work.
I’ve taken a few classes that touch on feminism and pornography (at an MA level — beat that, Jonny) and literally nothing he says means anything which is not surprising. If he were to express the views in the paper out loud he would surely be totally destroyed, which would hilariously end in him becoming violent and showing his true radical feminist colors against presumably many actual female and POCs
I question if he even goes to class.
I question if he is smart enough to find the classroom.
Like I said on Twitter, They’d salvage his fat arse. #underhiseye I do hope they make a TikTok of it.
Jessica is writing their profoundly badly composed “papers” in order to satisfy his CP urges; it’s not creepy, vile, pedo behavior if you’re looking at filth for “research purposes.” Or so they would have the world believe. In the same slimy way, he singles out people of color and radical feminists, by twisting his “opinions” and “conclusions” to point out what he hates, under the guise of defense. “I am a radical feminist,” therefore I can say whatever nasty things I want, because I include myself, Jessica. “Rape is ‘stereotypically’ a crime of “black men”: I, Jessica, am pointing this out as an injustice. Just kidding; I, Jessica Simpson, actually believe it, but because this is a “research paper,” I can say what I like.
(The same way Balenciaga excused their latest campaign, and others, as “artistic.” Just on a smaller, dumber scale. )
Jessica is indulging their fetishes and perversions openly, and more than likely feels they have manipulated the system to their infinite advantage. But hold on: you aren’t as clever as you think, Jess. Let us not forget the rich history you have left in your strange, gross wake. Any blubbering of “but, but, it was just research” would be soundly swatted aside with a mere thirty second perusal of your past, public, and proud attempts to contact young girls and women for disgusting purposes. You may think you’ll get away with it forever, but you will not. Nor can you hide behind your “transness” forever. Nor will physical assault, outright lies, and delusions of personal abuse continue to sway things in your favor. This is simply the truth.
There are so many transgender/transsexual people who are just trying to exist and be productive citizens: you are not one of them. You, Jessica, are simply a rotting whale carcass in the middle of the beach, that no one wants or dares to remove, for fear it will explode and spread its stink and corruption. How you don’t see this reveals so much about your pathological narcissism. It’s actually sad, and I’d pity you if you weren’t so arrogantly repugnant, and Hell bent on harming people.
Especially young people.
About as much “research” as his “turban fucker…social experiment”.
Hi, Jess. Thanks for the thumbs down. I appreciate your disapproval.
Again yaniv letting everyone know that he hasn’t a clue what he’s talking about.
Yaniv – “ Feminists should also reject pornography as pornography is meant to train men to be aggressive and to train women to be victims.”
So feminists should only be concerned with female pornography, not pornography as a whole? Does yaniv not realise males are sexually exploited also, are we to ignore their suffering?
Yaniv – “If you are minor and you are sexually exploited, or if you are over the age of 18 and producing nude images/videos, you are producing pornography.”
So toddlers who are subjected to rape etc are guilty of producing child pornography??? A 13 month old is to be held accountable?
Does he include himself in this claim? After all most of us have seen and heard his videos and pics. He himself is creating pornography and distributing it.
Pornography is a matter of supply and demand. By watching, actively encouraging and distributing it yaniv himself is adding to that demand. It seems, as usual, that yaniv doesn’t tar himself with the same brush.
He should spend time reading what true feminists want.
@jaime
I find it hilarious that he continues to claim that he is very much a “radical feminist” and hopes to get “on the same level” as Meghan Murphy, widely known as a radical feminist. Her feminist belief is that transgender “women” aren’t women.
Is jonny agreeing that transgender “women” aren’t women?
He thinks if children can be blamed for their own exploitation, then he cannot be blamed for seeking it out and enjoying it as “porn”
He seems to be laying the ground work its there fault i hold no blame.
To avoid plagiarism he is obviously reading other works and combining them in a haphazard way and trying to tie it together with his own views. The result is disjointed and confusing paper. Speaking about Male Violence and Women, Stereotypes, Radical Feminism and Marxist Feminism in a short paper? He is rambling. Professor Yaniv is trying to piece several topics together that just confuse the reader.
I can’t see him reading a great deal, his dreadful spelling, grammar and/or comprehension show that…proof is in his personal “conclusions”…there are none. It just shows that he hasn’t a clue what any of it means. Even when he changes a word here and there they’re howlers.
jonny’s “research”? – A few Google search words and poorly constructed plagiarism. That’s his homework done and dusted.
I’d be mortified if my name appeared anywhere on that “paper”.
Next “research” paper…Immigration & religion?
That halal meat triggers his CPTSD, fatal if the PoC serving can barely speak English.
Yaniv is fat.
377
Most radical feminists fight for rights most if not all of what the big man says in no way is being a feminist.
He’s no more a radical feminist (or even an activist come to that) than I am a male.
LOL, could you honestly see him standing up in a room full of women spouting his “feminist” nonsense, they’d crucify him.
Nah, jonny does jonny…badly, from behind his screen. Spouting crap about things he knows nothing about.
Yaniv is fat.
Blacks do commit the majority of crime so Yaniv got that right. It is why more are.in prison. No trans rules in prison it should go by biological sex – pre surgery. I would be ok with trans sex in prison. Might be cruel and unusual punishment though.
As a former clinical research nurse and published author, I weep that the word research is even allowed to be associated with this abomination. The first sentence of his “abstract” has no verb for effs sake!!! The first one!!! I won’t even go into the “content” of his paper because everyone here has already done a wonderful job with that. So obviously plagiarized because, Jon, but also because some of the terminology he uses. Tell me big Jon, what exactly IS a one tailed test? No peeking now! After this magnificent paper you should know exactly what that is. I also enjoy him using sources from 1975 and 1980, one of which had a total sample size of 66 participants. 66 people!!!! Ridiculous. Finally Jon, REAL women (as opposed to Eunuch/pedos like yourself) don’t need porn to “facilitate our orgasms”. Most of us have loving partners who help us get there, and if we don’t we are just fine on our own too. Tell me Jon, how does it feel knowing you will never orgasm again? Fills you with rage doesn’t it? Can’t tell you how happy that makes me.
I would like to thank Jonno for his well researched and thoughtful papers.
I look forward with delight to the next paper he will publish.
Keep up the good work!
I am obviously sarcastic here but the papers are amazing on a very distubing level.
I DO however look forward to read more papers of his and gain more glimpses into his insanity.