Details are scarce still but BC Court Services Online has a document showing Jessica Yaniv aka Jonathan Yaniv aka Jessica Simpson now has filed a civil suit for $11,800 against waxing salon women Sandeep Benipal, Marcia DaSilva, and Sukhdip Hehar.
Yaniv also claimed poverty again an was granted a fee waiver. I have requested documents from the BC Court and will post as soon as received. Expect a 36 hour turnaround.
Will update as details come in!
They just won’t learn will they. Well I expect a few laughs when they file the claim and I suspect that it will be thrown out as they haven’t suffered any financial loss because they couldn’t get their balls waxed
This proves just one thing-Jonathan has bigger balls than ANYONE could ever imagine!!!
Those poor women being dragged through the mud again. Yaniv, you are a parasite. The worst humanity has to offer – and that’s why the only person that loves you is your mother.
Jon you need to stop this. You’re going to get yourself beat up or killed. You cannot devote your entire life to harassing, stalking and terrorizing women and girls and expect to get away with it. These women and girls have men in their lives who are going to get fed up and come after you. You have made a nuisance of yourself in every way possible. You file court cases by the dozens, you call 911 every damn day, you lie about being sexually assaulted and the list goes on. At what point do you realize you’re just a vile disgusting beast and do something to better yourself? The question isn’t if it will catch up to you, it’s when. Will it be jail or an angry father or husband first? Those are the only 2 possible ways this will end.
Perfect reply and true in every sense of the word, my husband would have slapped this beast silly by now. I can’t wait until someone does.
I think you may have forgotten all of the resources JY has recently reached out to, after the fire in his condo/building…any guesses how much money the complex, or JY’s insurance carrier is looking at, simply related to this single false claim? (I’m also not including the hours of time dedicated by many, in taking down the “GoFundMeAccount”, for the Police Sergeant who “lives in his building). Can’t wait to watch Jonathan crash and burn!
This is what happens when a government becomes a defacto SJW and changes the laws so that an obviously seriously mentally ill person is pandered to at every turn.
I reckon this case will be thrown out too and I reckon he might have to cough up another six grand as well. Surely this is stalking and harassment by vexatious and frivolous legal action?
Twenty years ago Yaniv would have been locked up for life, they were the good old days when mental illness was recognised for what it was. He is schizophrenic and he is psychotic, a typical fucked up psychopath and nobody will stop him, in fact the courts are encouraging by giving him free legal fees, surely they have to stop doing this, it’s plain and obvious Yaniv has money by his travels & his restaurant bills.
The reader above got it right, there are a lot of people out there who want to do violence to Yaniv but he just keeps pushing the envelope. I can see what’s coming, it’s only a matter of time and I have no doubt that the only person that will be at his funeral is his wife Miriam.
I know you don’t like me but I saw those names and realized there is a pattern. I think it a is a joke that they are doing this again and I hope this gets tossed out or they lose badly. The 3 named defendants happen to be the only people that were awarded $2000 in the BCHRT decision. It would be hilarious if Yaniv is suing these people because they were awarded a judgement previously. I wonder what fanciful tale Yaniv’s civil court filing gives. I’ll need to make a large amount of popcorn to see how that drama unfolds.
My first though was this was a retribution suing for the award against him in small claims. I’m not sure how the court system works in Canada, but in US you can’t just take the same suit from one court to another in the same legislative area. If you take it to a higher court you have to take it as an appeal to ask the higher court to overturn the lower court ruling.
Judges have a very busy schedule and to see this on there schedule won’t make them happy.
Jeepers Creepers. BC must have a means to throw vexatious litigants out on their ear. Why can they not see THIS is what the vexatious litigant clause is for? No-one should be forced to defend themselves against a demented, aggressive narcissist.
I live close to our lovely flower yaniv Simpson, I have offered a full wax from front to back, I have my esthetics license, I even offerer ed jys the privilege of livestreaming it, I guess he just wants ppl he feels he can victimize.
I want to quibble with the headline here. Yaniv’s not suing salons – that is, suing businesses. He’s suing individual women.
That matters because the BCHRT found that one very valid reason these women declined to provide him with aesthetician services was that they wouldn’t be providing those services in salons. They would be providing them in their homes, where they needed to be particularly vigilant about their safety.
My hunch is that Yaniv’s suing these women – whom he was forced by the BCHRT to compensate – specifically to frighten them yet again and force them to pay for legal defense. He had to pay, so they have to pay. Neeeener neener neeeeener.
This matter – more than anything else he’s filed to date – should demonstrate to the BC courts that he has to be classed as a vexatious litigant so that future actions he seeks to take against others are reviewed by a judge who authorizes or declines to authorize the actions before they can be filed.
Great point! I think I’m the rush to get this posted (because holy shit!!) I went with that term. I guess in a way these women run “home salons” but they’re very different from a mall-based salon, so you’re right.
More details on this case to come today.
You’re doing great work.
That would explain my concern about taking the same case to another court. Perhaps it is a “new” case.